عنوان مقاله [English]
'Systematizing' has four equivocal meanings: knowledge of a system (in the genetic fields), search for a system (in the legislation fields), formation of a system (in conventional matters) and position of a system (in reality). Although the particular meaning of this word is regarding social conventional matters and common policy making, but its general meaning includes all the four [mentioned] fields; and also the Holy Qur'an, as a religious epistemological source, mentions each field accordingly.
If the process of systemization, according to my preferred definition, is not based on the bases extracted from Qur'anic knowledge on the one hand and is not compatible with social realities on the other hand, it would solve unreal, non-prior and imposed matters instead of solving real ones. This deviation from substantial religious sources causes failure of the Islamic system in the fulfillment of its material and spiritual purposes and thus makes the elites and the public suspicious of the revolutional identity of the Islamic system; and will lead to the establishment of non-religious social mini-systems and will prepare the situation for autocracy (even though small ones) and hegemonism (although partial) and formation of secular governorship (although calm and slithery but theorized).
What is happening in the process of systematization is the discovery of the problems of the systems and their solutions, That This matter done by relying on the Triple matters: sources, foundations and problems; explaining that It is a paradigm ( epistemic foundations ) that defines problems and solutions. And epistemic foundations are also discovered from sources, but the movement between these three sides is a rotational movement, not a linear one.