عنوان مقاله [English]
Keith Yandell the advocate of religious experience in proving God's existence. His argument is based on the development of the principle of empirical symmetry and the emphasis on the falsification of religious experiences.Hegets the principle with four conditions, by develops affirmative and negative ideas in the principle of experimental symmetry, which is the main premise to his argument. This paper attempts to study of Yandell's argument of religious experience in proving the existence of God in the monotheistic view point by descriptive-analytical method.In the first place,referred to the definition and classification of a variety of religious experiences from his point of view then, the Yandell's argument is explained, the final part of the article is allocated to criticizes his perspective and expressing the results. His views are criticized. Among the criticisms discussed in this article are:Equivalence of Revelation and religious experience, emphasizing the views of empiricism and its failure to prove the reliable of religious experience.Ultimately, though, his point of view has positive points, but it does not seem successful as an effective argument.