نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری رشته کلام _ فلسفه دین و مسائل جدید کلامی، دانشکده حقوق، الهیات و علوم سیاسی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
2 استادیار گروه فلسفه، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The issue of vision of God has been one of the most challenging theological topics in the history of religions, especially Islam. Shia theologians influenced by the traditions of Ahl al-Bayt (peace be upon them) and unlike some Sunni theologians, categorically rejected the vision of God through the eyes of the head and interpreted the relevant verses of the Qur'an with rational and mystical expressions. In this article, the views of two Sadraei philosophers, who are four centuries apart, have been compared and analyzed: One is Fayz Kashani, direct disciple and Mulla Sadra’s bridegroom, and the other is Ayatollah Hassanzadeh Amoli. The innovative aspect of the article is that it is proven that despite the time gap, there is no fundamental difference in the views of the two philosophers. Fayz Kashani interpreted the truth of vision and intuition by relying on the spiritual path, and Ayatollah Hassanzadeh explained this subject by relying on the spiritual path, but the inner meaning of both is the same. According to the philosophical superiority of Mulla Sadra's interpretations, Ayatollah Hasanzadeh's view can be considered as completed by Faiz Kashani's view.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
* قرآن مجید.
** نهج البلاغه.
)